<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Degrees of anonymity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.econometa.com/archives/48/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/48</link>
	<description>The economy of stuff about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/48/comment-page-1#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econometa.com/archives/48#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>Hi RBC,

I&#039;m a big fan of OpenID, and we&#039;ve been trying to think of how it could fit with PrefPass. It&#039;s interesting, because the two systems solve different problems: OpenID is a way to prove that you own a URL, while PrefPass lets a site know what you’re interested in and allows it to recognize you as the same visitor the next time you show up. 

One good thing about the anonymous PrefPass approach is that it completely avoids any need for crypto, server-side libraries, or defenses against security attacks — there’s nothing to steal! But of course that means that PrefPass can&#039;t help you prove that you&#039;re someone in particular, so that you can leave signed blog comments, etc. as with OpenID.

BTW, I didn&#039;t find anything at idkeed.com, was that a typo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RBC,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of OpenID, and we&#8217;ve been trying to think of how it could fit with PrefPass. It&#8217;s interesting, because the two systems solve different problems: OpenID is a way to prove that you own a URL, while PrefPass lets a site know what you’re interested in and allows it to recognize you as the same visitor the next time you show up. </p>
<p>One good thing about the anonymous PrefPass approach is that it completely avoids any need for crypto, server-side libraries, or defenses against security attacks — there’s nothing to steal! But of course that means that PrefPass can&#8217;t help you prove that you&#8217;re someone in particular, so that you can leave signed blog comments, etc. as with OpenID.</p>
<p>BTW, I didn&#8217;t find anything at idkeed.com, was that a typo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBC Man</title>
		<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/48/comment-page-1#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>RBC Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econometa.com/archives/48#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Probably marginally along the line, I wonder if PrefPass should be combined/integrated (through some API &amp; protocol) w/ OpenID (e.g. idkeed.com) where an user&#039;s Prefs and PrefPass&#039;s personalization capabilities (through Javascript) are blended w/ OpenID system&#039;s autentication capability....  Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably marginally along the line, I wonder if PrefPass should be combined/integrated (through some API &amp; protocol) w/ OpenID (e.g. idkeed.com) where an user&#8217;s Prefs and PrefPass&#8217;s personalization capabilities (through Javascript) are blended w/ OpenID system&#8217;s autentication capability&#8230;.  Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
