<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tagging and long tails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.econometa.com/archives/9/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/9</link>
	<description>The economy of stuff about stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EconoMeta  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The long tail tagging the dog</title>
		<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/9/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>EconoMeta  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; The long tail tagging the dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econometa.com/?p=9#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] onalization and personal data 			 		 	 		 			The long tail tagging the dog 	 			 					In a previous post, I mentioned some interesting graphs that could be made from public URL tagging data such as th [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] onalization and personal data 			 		 	 		 			The long tail tagging the dog 	 			 					In a previous post, I mentioned some interesting graphs that could be made from public URL tagging data such as th [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/9/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econometa.com/?p=9#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. It looks like you created a new chart of number of tags by number of users who use that many tags. This wasn&#039;t one of the potential charts I mentioned; this distribution would show whether the long tail of users assigning a high number of tags cumulatively comprises more users than those assigning a smaller number closer to the average. From this sample, at least, it looks like this isn&#039;t the case; most users assign a number of tags close to a median of somewhere around 50.

I&#039;d still love to see URLs by number of times a tag was assigned, or tags for a specific URL by number of times a tag was assigned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. It looks like you created a new chart of number of tags by number of users who use that many tags. This wasn&#8217;t one of the potential charts I mentioned; this distribution would show whether the long tail of users assigning a high number of tags cumulatively comprises more users than those assigning a smaller number closer to the average. From this sample, at least, it looks like this isn&#8217;t the case; most users assign a number of tags close to a median of somewhere around 50.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still love to see URLs by number of times a tag was assigned, or tags for a specific URL by number of times a tag was assigned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.econometa.com/archives/9/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 11:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.econometa.com/?p=9#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for flagging this up. Clay&#039;s &quot;long tail&quot; graphic looked so &#039;right&#039; that it didn&#039;t occur to me to question whether it said what it appeared to say.

It doesn&#039;t, frankly. If you re-crunch the numbers Clay was working with, you do end up with a huge left skew and a long-ish (although bumpy) right tail - working from &#039;0-25&#039; up to &#039;550-575&#039;, the figures are
15,15,7,7,3,4,2,3,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,2,3,0,0,0,0,1,0

But the skew is towards the *low* end of the distribution - what Clay calls the &#039;long tail&#039; - and (perhaps more importantly) that&#039;s a tiny, tiny sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for flagging this up. Clay&#8217;s &#8220;long tail&#8221; graphic looked so &#8216;right&#8217; that it didn&#8217;t occur to me to question whether it said what it appeared to say.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t, frankly. If you re-crunch the numbers Clay was working with, you do end up with a huge left skew and a long-ish (although bumpy) right tail &#8211; working from &#8217;0-25&#8242; up to &#8217;550-575&#8242;, the figures are<br />
15,15,7,7,3,4,2,3,0,1,0,0,1,1,0,2,3,0,0,0,0,1,0</p>
<p>But the skew is towards the *low* end of the distribution &#8211; what Clay calls the &#8216;long tail&#8217; &#8211; and (perhaps more importantly) that&#8217;s a tiny, tiny sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
